Western encouragement of terrorism
Another mark of increasing age, though I suppose I should be pleased at this one, was a request to deliver a memorial lecture. The topic given to me was "The March of Folly", which led me to look up the origin of the phrase. I knew it was the title of a book by the popular American historian Barbara Tuchman, but I had thought this was the one she wrote about the beginnings of the First World War, chronicling the headlong rush into a war that could have been avoided, and which destroyed the world its perpetrators thought to perpetuate.
In fact "The March of Folly" is a later book, based on the idea that folly is the pursuit by governments of policies contrary to their own interests. Tuchman deals with four examples of this, beginning with the decision of the Trojans to take into their city the horse left on the beach by the Greeks who had pretended to abandon their attempt to conquer Troy. She goes on to discuss the policies of the Popes who precipitated the Reformation, and then the British blunders that led to the independence of the United States. Finally, and at length, she deals with the American disaster in Vietnam.
All very interesting subjects and I should now read the book. But it gave me a focus for this new series, which will look at recent political history in the context of folly in the Tuchman sense. I will not confine myself to governments alone, since the whole picture demands looking also at what others in the political arena engage in. And the series will be different from the lecture, which will have to be tightly focused. But these articles will I hope provide some food for thought, and with luck some changes in approach – assuming, that is, that those who decide, and those who influence decision making, both read and think.
Folly of the West
I will begin however, in an area where obviously I cannot hope for influence, since I shall talk about the folly of the West in persecuting us for achieving what it pretends it desires namely the eradication of terrorism. But from the Sri Lankan perspective it is essential to consider this too, for the mess the current government is in, springs largely from its unthinking acceptance of Western mythology. Some in the government, and even perhaps the Prime Minister, have begun to realize how badly they blundered way back in 2015, but he has no idea how to reverse gear effectively, and he certainly cannot even begin to do this while Mangala Samaraweera continues to run foreign affairs and bleat helplessly in Geneva.
We need to begin with the sheer cynicism with which the West treated us in 2009. In the preceding eight years, under George Bush, the United States had been relatively positive about us, and certainly its Ambassador Bob Blake was more balanced than the spivvy British High Commissioner Dominic Chilcott, or the ineffably patronizing, also British, European Union Head of Mission, Julian Wilson.
But in 2009, Bob changed, and explained to one of my staff that he now served a different government. Sadly foreign policy running was made there by Hillary Clinton whom Barack Obama had made his Secretary of State. This was disastrous for Sri Lanka, which had been relieved when she failed to get the Democrat nomination, given that we knew that the terrorist diaspora were congratulating themselves, on having won favour with her after massive contributions to her campaign.
So she did her worst, aided and abetted by sanctimonious hypocrites like Susan Rice and Samantha Power, and the dominatrix they sent to Geneva, Eileen Donahoe. These bleeding hearts, as a leading official in the Bush Administration called them, were powerless to change factors such as Guantanamo which they had bewailed under Bush, so they turned their fire on easy targets like Sri Lanka (indeed he told me that if we just did a few things to keep them happy, they could then be diverted to an even easier target such as Djibouti).
Why were they doing this? First of course, was the commitments Hillary Clinton had, according to the Diaspora, made to them. Second was their attempt to show genuine proponents of human rights that they were doing something. Through their rhetoric about Sri Lanka, aided and abetted by less obviously manipulative government funded entities such as Human Rights Watch, they could divert attention from their misdeeds in places such as Libya and Syria, and their support for fundamentalist terrorists in those places. Third was the feeling that Sri Lanka under Mahinda Rajapaksa was not prepared to become a cog in a US machine, yet another willing agent of the domination they wished to perpetuate.
I could understand then Mahinda's point when I told him that a few simple measures would relieve the pressure. He told me that, whatever he did, they would hate him. Given how badly the West had behaved in Geneva, the Americans included from 2009 on, he was correct. But where he failed was in keeping India on board. Indeed, he was manipulated by his principle adviser on foreign affairs at the time – not G.L. Peiris, who was also an easily manipulated cipher – into thinking that India was the real enemy, not the West, after India sadly supported the West's resolution of March 2012.
But that is another story. To return to what the West was up to, the sad part, the folly is that their strategy was entirely counterproductive. Whereas, given that Sri Lankans in positions of influence find their comfort zone in the West, given that the West is our most important market, Sri Lanka, if treated well, would have been a helpful ally. But this would not have entailed unthinking adherence to a Western agenda, for we would not have been hostile to others under Western duress. And this was perhaps the sticking point, for foolishly the West wants total subservience, not simply support for its own vital interests.
Total domination is what – leaving aside in the oddly included Trojan Horse episode – the protagonists in Barbara Tuchman's book wanted. But what authoritarians down the ages have failed to recognize is that, when such efforts at domination fail, the reaction is total rejection, not the general camaraderie with everyone that is the preferred, and most profitable, path for the comparatively weak.
Another fiasco as far as the rationale for Western hypocrisy went was the brilliance with which the Diaspora dumped their patrons when they failed. After putting all their eggs in the Clinton basket in 2008, they were fortunate that Obama, in his desire for wider acceptance, gave her so much authority (which we later gathered had contributed to the fiasco in Libya, where he had not initially supported the overthrow of Gaddafi). In 2016, Clinton lost and it was the Trump the Diaspora had striven to defeat who won, with no hope of the return of the harridan. But almost immediately they abandoned the fallen woman and set up Tamils for Trump, which will doubtless soon convince him that they were heart and soul behind him from the start.
This certainly happened in Britain. The terrorist Diaspora worked incredibly hard for the Labour Party, and indeed David Milliband, as Foreign Secretary, explained to the Americans who were not as bitter about Sri Lanka initially that this was for electoral considerations. But when in 2010 Labour lost, Tamils emerged as strong supporters of David Cameron (with Sri Lanka incidentally having contributed to this easy transition by having failed to appoint a new High Commissioner for months, so that the opportunity to establish good relations with the new government was squandered).
Decimation of civilians
But where I think the West shot itself most seriously in the foot was in losing the chance to understand how to deal effectively with terrorism without decimation of the civilians amidst whom terrorists operate. Any objective examination of what we did makes it clear that we took care of civilians as best possible within the context of the Tigers using them as human shields. We provided health and education facilities throughout, including transporting to hospitals in government territory those in need of medical help (all it would seem, given that we took along even more who were described by the ICRC as bystanders).
Essential food was available, as is obvious from the stocks of grain that the Tigers used to build barricades. And the hundreds of thousands who fled to government territory when we created an opportunity for this, in April 2009, when the Tigers were trying to sacrifice everyone, make it clear that the civilians had not gone willingly as was claimed. Indeed the failure of aid agencies to persuade the Tigers to allow their workers to leave with them makes clear the intransigence of the Tigers as well as the hypocrisy of those agencies that did nothing about the thousands of ordinary people the Tigers were forcibly keeping.
But perhaps I am naïve in thinking the West actually cares about civilians. Certainly the number of civilians who have suffered in the wars they have been relentlessly waging in the Middle East, the flippancy with which they admit that drones have destroyed the innocent, their continuing protection of the wicked who support them, suggest that they do not care a hoot for the values they use to undermine countries they do not like.
And yet, that too is counterproductive. As they found with so many tyrants they supported who then switched over, it is only alliances based on principles that can be relied on. And even when they can be sure that there will be no abandoning of the West, as with Israel or the fascist regime they have now installed in the Ukraine, the price they have to pay in continuing support for increasingly vicious behaviour rises all the time. Any except the most bigoted must realize that, with every excess the United States permits Israel, disenchantment with the West increases, and this will soon change even the stance of what are seen as devoted allies – whose excesses, it should be noted, the West continues to endorse.
But, Barbara Tuchman noted, the march of folly will continue until disaster occurs. The worry now though is that that disaster will engulf others too, and those who have in no way contributed to the mess will also suffer. It will be no consolation that the perpetrators of the disaster will suffer what for them will be a minor setback.
- China to provide 90 water bowsers worth Rs 1b 2184
- Wag the Dog 2195
- A brief look at FARC’s origins in Colombia 2145
- ‘Panama Papers’ bags Pulitzer 2168
- SAITM will cooperate with Govt 2170
- dead man was near fashion mall 2214
- Japanese MPs back Lanka’s development 2176
- CB Bond earnings whitewashed – JVP 2187
- Talks to extend Lanka’s Continental Shelf 2178
- Ex-DIG and son re-remanded 2193
- Government can be sent home 2728
- GMOA flogging SAITM for Mahinda– Rajitha 2192
- Ranil invites Japan to invest in S. Asia 2165
- Somali Pirates’ Captives Back Home 2179
- Customs in Rs 8 M bust 2176
- Redefining Rape 2279
- The march of folly Our mad Cabinet system 1819
- First adventures in Europe 1902
- Inspiration for writers 1882
- Sri Lanka’s sustainable development dream 2041
- Sinhala and Tamil New Year with Easter 2063
- Filipino Oconer wins overall title 1814
- Unsporty conduct by Joes 1862
- Bertie Wijesinghe, pre-Test era Sri Lankan cricketer, dies aged 96 1830
- CEAT revs up for 2017 1817
- Palace shock Arsenal 1807
- Argentina fire coach Bauza 1821
- BCCI postpones SGM to 18 April 1796
- Murray returns from injury 1806
- New mum Azarenka to return to WTA 1791
- Galle win by 188 runs 1793
- Keeping Cool 1812
- Do the right thing and do it now! 1821
- Ravi Jayewardene Pious son of a political giant 2406
- In the heart of the old country 2235
- Sarath Weerasekera’s Geneva adventure 2057
- No moral right to play with public funds 1977
- No need for fine if route permits are issued in fair, just manner 1868
- UDA incurs Rs 330M Loss 1810
- DOUSING A MEGA SHIP FIRE 1643
- Health authorities in denial? 2114
- Minorities’ frustration a powder keg – VIDURA 2162
- Administrative powers a must for the Plantation Tamils –Radhakrishnan 1419
- Rajapaksa sought advice from McGuinness– Indika Perera 2537
- I will lead SLFP to victory in future elections – President 1929
- Hang the ‘traitors’– RTD. REAR ADMIRAL WEERASEKARA 2318
- We oppose Nationalism and Federalism – Samarasinghe 3031
- SilkAir launches direct flights to Colombo 1866
- Rupee falls on thin volumes 1810
- SriLankan, Japan Airlines add new routes 1831
- Colombo Port box volume up 5.6-pct in Jan 1808
- Private sector to transform into main domestic growth engine 1838
- Oil eases from 5-week top, rising US production weighs 1800
- Tight fiscal and monetary policies constrain SL’s growth 1818
- Shell admits dealing with money launderer 1818
- Toshiba may sell chip business to Foxconn for $27bn 1814
- Asian shares pressured by geopolitical risks; Nikkei down 0.25% 1808
- SLIM launches Certificate in Digital Marketing 1812
- Microsoft Hosts Second ‘Device Day’ in Sri Lanka 1815
- Emirates named Best Airline in the World 1806
- Turkish Airlines and social media assist Somalia 1804
- Brain cell therapy ‘promising’ for Parkinson’s disease 1811
- Trump pushed into bombing Syria 1857
- Thailand discovers Power of Women Travellers 1825
- Economics of gambling 1707
- Trans National Aural Identity 3392
- Queen Anula The Shadow of Cleopatra 3418
- Poetry and its possibilities Part 2 3434
- The Enigma of Labyrinths 3545
- From Couture to Kutir 3427
- Hybrid Sources 4830
- Offering Riddles & Enigmas 4886
- Poetry and its possibilities 4925
- With a festive bang! 1047
- Easter Fun 1036
- Arrogance and crowing is the way of the doomed 1069
- Avurudu on the streets 1084
- Tick control 1062
- Sunny Sunday on the beach 1056
- It’s time to save the world 1118
- From viewer to YouTuber! 1119
- Expert skincare and makeup 1142
- Avurudu at Induruwa 1106
- Exo 1132
- Remembering our fallen heroes 2224