Hambantota Agreement Palpably one-sided
By Prof. G.L. Peiris
GIST OF REPRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND INVESTMENT C0-CHAIRED BY FORMER VICE CHANCELLOR PROF. W.D. LAKSHMAN AND FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL PALITHA FERNANDO PC.
The alienation of national assets should be contemplated with the greatest reluctance and in all cases as the last resort. Every other avenue should first be explored to manage and deploy these assets as a viable commercial venture in the national interest.
There is every prospect of developing the Hambantota Port as a profitable enterprise by 2020, by adopting a comprehensive strategy.
The previous government ensured that investors would be required to pay a minimum of US dollars 50,000 as lease rent per hectare per year, with a 3% increase each year.
Companies had to pay for export of their finished goods, as well as for the raw materials imported through the port.
There was a payment levied for each container.
Additionally, investors were required to bring in US dollars 1,100 million.
Bunkering was to be developed as a lucrative enterprise, and royalty payments were also to be levied.
In any event, no provision detrimental to the sovereignty of the country should be included in an agreement with a foreign country or company.
Personnel and cargo
Decisions relating to admission of vessels and security of ships, personnel and cargo within a port should always be within the competence of the Sri Lankan State.
The right of the State to make decisions with regard to the economic development of the country, should in no way be compromised or diminished.
The clause in the proposed Hambantota Port Agreement, preventing the Ports Authority of Sri Lanka from establishing a terminal within a 100 kilometre radius, until the Hambantota port accomplishes 50 per cent of its total capacity, is unacceptable.
Valuation of the asset must be done scientifically, in keeping with proper criteria, in an entirely transparent manner.
In the case of Hambantota Port, the valuation is based solely on construction cost, and leaves out of account the land value and commercial value. The result is a horrendous distortion.
At the point of acquisition of shares by the Chinese company, there is no valuation by reference to international standards, but when the shares are transferred to a Sri Lankan company within ten years, payment by the latter has to be on an international evaluation. This is a double standard, very much to our detriment.
The proportion of shares has to be carefully considered, with the national interest in focus.
Our agreement with China Harbour was on the basis of 65% shares for SLPA, and 35% for the Chinese company. The proposed agreement with China Merchant envisages 80% for the Chinese company, and only 20% for SLPA.
In fact, the transaction is even more adverse. SLPA is required to make investments pro rata, when the Chinese company incurs expenditure for expansion and development of the port. If SLPA is unable to do this, the share percentage for the Chinese company increases, while the SLPA percentage of shares is reduced.
The estimated cost of the 3rd Phase of development of Hambantota Port is 2,000 million U.S. dollars. The 1/5 share of SLPA, then, is 400 million U.S. dollars. This sum is clearly not within the means of SLPA. The result is that the share distribution will be about 90% for the foreign company, and 10% for SLPA.
The land to be leased out within the port is grossly undervalued.
There are 2, 000 hectares within the Hambantota port. Five-hundred hectares are to be leased out.
If the foreign company pays upfront, it secures a lease of 500 hectares (approximately 1, 200 acres) for 99 years for Rs 12, 100 million.
When tenders were called for a lease of six acres within the Port of Colombo, the private sector offered Rs 60,000 million for the leasing of 6 acres for a period of 33 years. The disparity is glaring.
An international trade agreement must necessarily be governed by the principles of mutuality and reciprocity.
The proposed Hambantota Agreement is palpably one-sided, with the foreign company acquiring all the assets but taking on none of the liabilities.
The principle of employment security is of crucial importance.
The workers in Hambantota Port have no assurance of continuity of their employment. The contractual stipulations confer on the foreign company the discretion to make decisions in this regard.
There must be a clear assurance of financial viability.
The effect of the proposed Hambantota agreement is that there will be no income accruing to the SLPA at all for 15 years; and, even after that period, an income will be forthcoming only if the Chinese company declares a dividend.
However, in the meantime, the debt to the Chinese continues, and will have to be serviced. There is no debt-equity swap. The government has admitted that the funds received from the Chinese company will not be utilized to retire the debt, but will be credited to the Central Bank and used for other expenses. This means that the public will be burdened with further taxes to generate the funds required to settle the continuing debt, with interest.
The issue of legal competence (or vires) is paramount.
There is a written Legal Opinion by the previous Attorney-General, the Hon. Palitha Fernando, PC, to the effect that the SLPA is not legally competent to be a signatory to an agreement of this nature, without an appropriate amendment to the SLPA Act. All statutory authorities must act strictly within the limits of their powers.
- Cabinet reshuffle 3780
- Finance stripped from ravi 3785
- Farce behind the reshuffle – JVP 3777
- Vasu suffers heart attack 3812
- Dr. Padeniya charged with contempt 3781
- Rs 2M compensation for Dulanjali 3846
- JO slams Cabinet reshuffle 3760
- Population boom 3983
- Why remove Best Finance Minister? – Dullas 3762
- Indira Gandhi asked RAW to aid LTTE – KP 3778
- Prez Sirisena Aussie bound 3759
- Lanka’s power sector 3737
- N&E merger impossible – Hizbullah 3750
- Woman dies in wild jumbo attack 3749
- Canadian PM reiterates call to Sri Lanka 3777
- Indian meddling and the Mahinda Question 4433
- China’s future geostrategy 4251
- NIR Ministry spends frugally 4131
- Owner arrested after surrendering 4096
- Petrol bombs hurled at Mosque in Kurunegala 4172
- Govt Doctors to report sick today! 4035
- Rathana Thera’s vehicle in mishap 4401
- Expect ‘unbelievable’ changes – Amaraweera 4062
- Five Police teams deployed for probe 4037
- Commission takes a break 4066
- Suggesting tunes for different pipers 2418
- Move to build golf and hotel resort 2422
- From Russia, China, India & EU to Australia 2278
- Gone yet not out 3479
- PCs in crisis mode 3462
- Wesley win by 181 runs 2868
- Scotland seal second title 2871
- Terry says goodbye in style 3078
- Royal well-deserved champions 4079
- Sri Lanka Cricket to spend 70 M on RPICS 3015
- Santhush qualifies for World Youth 3865
- Maris Stella, Isipathana, President’s win 2866
- SL needs Malinga magic upfront 3369
- Bizarre Ruling ruins Asmika’s Golden hope in Asian Youth 2869
- Ambalangoda’s big match ends in draw 3651
- Good governance thro electoral reforms 2473
- Sri Lanka’s foreign reserves Ground reality 3970
- Cyberbullying and scared women 3229
- Will this make you ‘wanna cry’? 3055
- Brace for dengue surge 3125
- There are many issues to iron out 3135
- Nationalizing SAITM would be a mistake 3442
- SB IS TALKING RUBBISH! 1939
- Eligibility criteria stiffer than in State Universities – SB 2296
- Joint Opposition will accept President Sirisena’s leadership – Vasudeva Nanayakkara 4150
- $ 68M creamed off to service debt 1041
- Nationwide inflation down to 8.4% in April 2881
- Allianz Lanka registers impressive Q1 2017 2874
- Bourse falls amid foreign sales 2875
- India invited to participate in power sector 2874
- Access Engineering posts highest ever PAT of Rs 2.6B 2862
- Exchange rate at all time low of Rs 154.54 2869
- Exporters urge removal of Indian NTBs 2877
- State banks may face capital adequacy issues 2886
- Asian stocks rise as US political concerns ease 2867
- Traps from different quarters 1436
- Are we an ungrateful society? 1323
- Provincial slavery and political buffoonery 1870
- AN AMERICAN WEREWOLF IN LONDON (1981) 2103
- Did “WannaCry” make you cry? 2758
- Local Psychologists should receive due acceptance 1077
- Hatha yoga benefits are numerous - Anandhie Vilvaraja 1108
- Amaya Resorts and Spas offer an exquisite Lankan experience 1065
- Queen of Nuwara Eliya Regains Glory 3305
- Voyage of Time in a dreamy landscape 3357
- Recurrent Dreams, Not a Nightmare 3298
- Radical Approach to Cinema 3281
- Alston Koch felicitated in ‘Highest Capital City in the World’ 4155
- Love, loneliness and lingering 4088
- Approaches to The Consumer Society 4039
- Shaping Culture Through Mass Media 4049
- Lichens, the coolest thing you never heard of 934
- What would life bee…? 933
- Bask in natural luxury 905
- Diverse dishes straight from China 895
- Young ones on stage 903
- Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children 901
- A musical celebration 906
- PC gamer tips and tricks 922
- King Arthur 903
- Going to the theatre 904
- Instagramming just got easier 765
- Welisara heats up 793