One Final Offer From the EU to the UK
By Paul Goldschmidt
It is becoming clearer by the day that even if 'sufficient progress' is made on a divorce agreement by December this year, the time remaining for negotiating and ratifying a 'transition deal' will prove insufficient. If there is not a rapid radical shift in the framework of the Brexit negotiations, the process will die unresolved on 29 March 2019. This will lead inexorably to a deep crisis that is as predictable and therefore unnecessary.
It will undoubtedly cause considerable damage to theUK, but also Britain to hurt the European Union as well.
The least bad solution
It is in this context that the ideas expressed recently in Brussels by the former Irish Prime Minister John Bruton deserve careful consideration. Recognizing that there are no 'good' solutions to the Brexit conundrum, he focuses on the practicality of the least 'bad' one.
His proposal is to trigger immediately the clause of Article 50 of the Treaty that allows prolonging the initial two-year negotiating period (starting from the official notification on 29 March, 2017) by a further 4 years (until 29 March, 2023).
It requires the unanimous approval of the EU 27 (and of the UK) as well as a majority vote by the European Parliament.
There are of course serious drawbacks to the proposal, but the advantages seem, nevertheless, far more compelling:
On the negative side:
• It will be difficult for the Brexiteers to swallow as it means a painful delay in – and a possible reversal of – the government's commitment to implement the results of the referendum.
• It risks splitting the Conservative Party, leading to a political crisis and open the way for a Labour Government. (This might happen anyway, but would become unmanageable if constrained by the current negotiating timetable).
• It postpones for four more years any possibility for the UK to negotiate trade deals with third countries.
• It will be difficult to accept by all the EU 27 because it prolongs the full 'membership' of the UK with all its 'privileges and obligations.'
• It might prove difficult for the European Parliament (and the 28 Members) to envisage the participation of the UK in the spring 2019 European Parliamentary elections (though there is no legal impediment if the UK remains a member).
• It might interfere significantly with other EU priorities, such as the need for carrying out comprehensive reforms, in particular if the UK is in a position to obstruct such initiatives.
On the positive side:
• It removes immediately the time pressure allowing a more serene atmosphere for continuing negotiations and a more realistic timeframe to conclude them.
• It allows the sequencing demanded by the 27, leaving sufficient time to negotiate and implement the EU-UK future relationship while hopefully removing the need for a 'transition period.'
• It allows the UK the necessary time to recruit and train the additional staff it will require to assume taskspreviously carried out by the EU, which appears extremely difficult to carry out under the presently defined timetable.
• Removing the need for a formal negotiated and ratified 'transition agreement' will save a significant amount of time and effort. Indeed, even if the terms of a transition are agreed, it does not provide any assurances of a successful outcome concerning the future relationship, thus prolonging the uncertainty and encouraging actors to take 'irreversible' decisions sooner.
If John Bruton's proposals are to be considered seriously, they will nevertheless require certain amendments to the status quo ante that should be included in the Article 50 prolongation procedure:
• The UK should be granted the formal option to withdraw 'unilaterally' at any time during the negotiations, the Article 50 notification in order to remain an EU Member after 29 March, 2023.
• In exchange the UK would agree, if it exercised its option, to forgo its budget rebate, join Schengen and abandon all of its other opt-outs (including from the Eurozone). Furthermore it would undertake not to trigger Article 50 for a minimum period (15-20 years).
Such demands will certainly be deemed 'outrageous,' but an agreement along these lines presents considerable advantages for the UK: the government could offer its citizens (or Parliament) a new referendum with three clear options:
• Approval of the deal as negotiated with the EU.
• Withdrawal from the EU rejecting the proposed deal.
• Exercise of the UK's option to withdraw the Article 50 notification in full knowledge of the consequences (see above).
Weighing the options
The third option should be weighed carefully in the light of the problems associated with leaving the EU, the negative consequences of which have so far been muted but are expected to increase significantly as time goes by.
Within the reality of an interdependent multipolar world, it boils down to a choice between exercising a largely 'virtual independent sovereignty' and sharing with the other Member States a truly 'effective joint sovereignty' in promoting the highly correlated interests of Europe's citizens on the world stage.
The proposed procedure would also allow the feelings of abuse that have been hurled by both Brexiteers and Remainers at each other, to heal.
It would provide a solid base for facing the future – whether in or out of the EU – with a reunited sense of belonging, overcoming the deep splits that have appeared between generations as well as between various parts of the United Kingdom.
A fully informed consultation of the population would restore the necessary balance between 'democracy,' 'the rule of law' and 'human rights' which are each indissociably intertwined in the pursuit of 'freedom' which, as was so well expressed recently by Commissioner Frans Timmermans in relation to the events in Catalonia, form the bedrock of the Union's values.
An additional benefit of this approach is to put at the centre of the discussions the interests of millions of citizens, be it those residing in each other's territory (whose status will remain in jeopardy until a final agreement is reached) and those – both nationals and aliens – employed by companies whose business is affected by Brexit.
Putting the interests of citizens first
It should be the main purpose of any self-respecting government to put the interests of its citizens ahead of dogmatic or ideological party political prejudices or interests.
Rather than pinning one's hope on the collapse of the EU as a weak ex post justification for Brexit, it is high time for those responsible for the future of the United Kingdom to think of serious 'damage control' and consider calmly solutions, such as the one presented by John Bruton.
If it appears initially to be totally unacceptable, it provides, however, a sensible way of implementing the democratically expressed views of British citizens.
- India’s Choice: Saintliness Vs Efficiency
- Commercial Credit Japanese Firm moves in
- Man shot dead at Punchi Borella
- SAITM still exists, claims GMFSPA Group to meet Maha Sangha
- Lanka tour operators to visit Pakistan
- Fake sms on petrol shortage again! Leads to panic buying in Kandy
- Zimbabwe's ruling party sacks Mugabe
- Ranil before PCoI today
- Gintota clash masterminded by ex-PS member-Police
- BBS Chief in fiery row with scribe Alleged threat to slap Chandraprema
- SL has executed 76% of the proposals by UPR
- Gintota Unrest:PM calls for official report from IGP
- Action against COPE MPs caught talking to Aloysius Speaker to meet party leaders this week
- UNP furious over phone tapping CID, AG’s Dept blamed for ‘media show’
- Treasury Bonds Probe AG to question PM
- Gintota clashes 19 remanded Govt on desperate mission to arrest extremists
- ‘A prisoner in Indian jail on Eelam soil’
- Sagala vows to crush Aava group Police deployed in full strength
- Politico’s son-in-law in school frock drama Teacher threatened after student is reprimanded
- Lanka alarmed over increased smuggling of ‘KG’
- SC to hear Tangalle ASP assault case
- 656 kg Glyphosate nabbed
- FPTP opens gate for undesirables, warns Amunugama
- EC to issue nomination notice on 27th
- NPC Education Minister shuns national flag Sarveshwaran was Chief Guest at school event
- Kandy SC in runaway win
- SLC clarifies Dilruwan’s actions
- India take 49 run lead
- Six-year-old wins two Silvers in shooting events
- Renown rout Blue Stars 4-0
- MAS Unichela emerge champions
- Senkadagala Rally
- Air Force SC in 15-7 win over Police SC
- ‘Singer Cup’ Under-19 Schools Cricket Malshan scores century
- Afghanistan U-19 create history Youth U-19 Asia Cup 2017
- Mahinda College move on to all-island stage
- Glitz Cric Quiz back for its fifth year
- Pogba drives Man Utd fightback
- England in emphatic win
- Neuville wins Rally Australia
- CEB and Air Force emerge volleyball champs
- Angelo, Lahiru prop Sri Lanka
- Ritzbury Sir John Tarbat Junior School Athletic Championship 2017 Janadhipathi BV and St. Joseph’s emerge champions
- Air Force, Police look for first win
- Navy defeat lethargic Havies
- Power plant delays cost Rs 51 B
- 200 to 300 HYDROPOWER PROJECTS ON HOLD
- DSI MD calls for protectionism
- SL to produce sea wave energy
- WB moots PPPs for gender parity
- Menik Farm refugee village gets apparel factory
- Reserves strengthened by $ 74M
- Asian markets end quiet week mixed
- Treasury guarantees of Rs 8,55B sustain 22 public entities
- Will retail apocalypse hit Britain next?
- Huawei creates ‘Smart City Nervous System’
- NDB Capital Scholarship Programme marks 4th year
- Abans wins top retailer and service awards
- How to get rich and mobile banking going social
- A minimalist approach to social media marketing
- Why Moody’s is no longer singing the blues on India
- Women breach world of big oil
- SriLankan Airlines’ marketing activations rewarded
- iflix Sri Lanka opens new office in Colombo
- Aviation sector to be liberalized
- The National Flag A Muddled Tamil voice
- Rohingya children Face a bleak future
- New Constitution:National perspective versus political aspirations
- Pyramid Selling
- Centenary of the October Revolution: 1917 – 2017
- China and Vietnam: Beyond Diplomacy
- Middle East: Kurdish Pawn Sacrificed
- Concretes and abstracts Two comics at the Savoy in London
- Row over beer tax
- Illegal mining Muttur’s sandy secret Hundreds of tons of sand taken away at night
- eLECTRIC AND HYBRID CARS MUST BE PRICED REASONABLY
- Wigneswaran’s claim Devanampiya Tissa was a Tamil king An academically naïve proposition Prof Raj Somadeva
- There is no journey with the UNP
- Core values of the UNP are eroding - Pradeep Jayewardene
- UN compensation for Kuwait workers Rs 3.2 B on migrant worker welfare
- An argument for a new Constitution
- ‘Otriachchi’, ‘Orumiththa Nadu’, ‘Aekeeya Rajya’ and unitary state
- A Constitutional Framework for Sri Lanka
- PAST LIFE AND RULING PLANETS IN KRISHNAMURTHI PADHDHATHI
- Build before onset of Kona Masa
- Palms of road accident victims
- Want to get rid of malefic Saturn ?
- Installing doors and windows according to Vastu
- Our children and our cinema
- INTERPRETING ASIAN CINEMA: CHALLENGES AHEAD
- How Sanskrit journalism is slowly hogging headlines
- ice manufacturing in South Asia
- CMSC’s season finale concert
- Two documentaries on Sri Lanka in Film South Asia 2017
- Politics of nostalgia
- Vibrancy of classical Sinhala poetry
- Kite Surfing Lanka Kalpitiya An experience of a lifetime
- Ella and mini Adam’s Peak
- A cave of history -Ravana Cave
- Conquering Fashion
- Gavin Ryan’s Salon Professionalism to the next level
- THE WRITER’S KITCHENETTE THE CRANBERRY ADVENTURES
- Calamitous Earthquake in Iran
- Scientists warn of ‘giant leap backward’ at climate talks
- Death of Ananda Senaratne