Senanayake thanked Lord Naseby For his ‘invaluable work’ on behalf of Sri Lanka

  👤  3789 readers have read this article !
By 2017-11-15

The Joint Opposition Parliamentary Group Leader MP Dinesh Gunawardena moving a motion for debate at the time of the adjournment of the House last evening (14) on a recent debate on Sri Lanka's conflict in the House of Lords in Britain, demanded to know what hinders the Government to take a follow up and fight against the war crimes charged levelled against Lanka's security forces.

The Joint Opposition found fault with the Government for the latter's inability to move forward in the initiative taken by Lord Naseby to recognize that the country's security forces fought a war against terrorism.

The motion moved by MP Gunawardena said that: "Since Lord Naseby, addressing Britain's House of Lords, drew attention to the fact that the casualty figures for the last period of the civil conflict in Sri Lanka, which ended in May 2009, cited in the United Nations' (UN) Darusman Report, were brought into question by the figures quoted by former United Nations Spokesman Gordon Weiss, by former United States (US) Ambassador Robert Blake, in the report by the United Kingdom's (UK) Major General Holmes, and finally, by the heavily-redacted communications from the UK's Lieutenant Colonel Anton Gash released to him by the British Government; and since he further stated that "the UK must recognize that this was a war against terrorism, so the rules of engagement are based on international humanitarian law, and not the European Convention on Human Rights" and that "the West, and in particular the US and UK, must remove the threat of war crimes and foreign Judges that overhangs and overshadows all Sri Lankans, especially their leaders," the Government of Sri Lanka should take action to pursue this matter with Britain's Foreign and Commonwealth Office and with the UN Human Rights Commission to change their unjust positions in regard to Sri Lanka and thereby remove the threat to this country, to its defence forces, and to its leaders, and that the Government should also report back to the Parliament on this matter."

Joint Opposition MP Sisira Jayakody seconding the motion said that the Government leaders do not have a backbone to stand up against the charges levelled against Sri Lanka. "The mother-in-law of the Navy intelligence officer Sumith Ranasinghe committed suicide stating in a letter that her son-in-law who fought valiantly has been incarcerated for more than seven months. She committed suicide because she could not bear up the injustice. That suicide indicates the injustices meted out to the war heroes who liberated the country from the terrorists."

MP Ali Zaheer Moulana said that Sri Lankans should thank Lord Naseby for his efforts.

MP Gunawardena said that Deputy Minister Dr. Harsha de Silva had recently spoken against Lord Naseby's revelation in Geneva and queried as to what would be the Government's response to Minister Silva's position on the matter.

State Minister of Foreign Affairs Wasantha Senanayake said that: "I do not think that Minister Dr. Harsha de Silva made such a statement. Without knowing what he meant I cannot comment on his position. I wish to assure the members of the House that I as the State Minister with the concurrence and approval of the President approved of Lord Naseby's good work. I appreciated his work valuable to Sri Lanka. I thanked Lord Naseby for his "invaluable work" on behalf of Sri Lanka. I said that the information made public by Lord Naseby "makes it clear that the Sri Lankan armed forces fought a much cleaner war than is often alleged in the international arena. We got an opportunity which should not be missed. We all should write a letter thanking Lord Naseby for taking the initiative to help Lankan security forces clear their names of crimes they never committed."



Read More


Read More


Read More


Read More


Read More